195. The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen
The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen (Farrar, Straus
and Giroux, 2001; 568) is a disquisition on American pop culture and the American
family as it transits from a period of familial bond and quaint prohibitions to
that of material bond and quick-fixes in a freer do-what-you-want world and
where its [the family’s] values have shifted from a personal relationship among
kin to a personal relationship with wealth, respectively.
In this unforgiving but dispassionate analysis
of the middle class, Franzen single-mindedly sought to expose the effects of wanton
and desperate quest for wealth as expressed in uncontrolled consumerism,
materialism, profiteering and above all the satisfaction of the singular self
on the unifying role of the family as an institution and, therefore, on the
American system. He exposes the darker side of a system that has put premium on
consumption of commodities and that has redefined success as one’s ability to consume
limitlessly. So much has consumption, of goods and services, become important
in the current economic system that growth and prosperity of the individual and
the nation, as a whole, is predicated on it. Consequently, a drop in the
Consumer Index of a country leads to a prod in the society’s flanks by either the
monetary or fiscal authorities of that country to stimulate spending.
What makes Franzen’s The Corrections different from many other novelistic commentaries on
America’s socio-cultural metamorphosis, such as Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, is that his is not a prognostication;
his is a social analysis of present, as it unfolds. In this inductive thesis, the
family as the unit of society serves as Franzen’s guinea pig upon which
incisions and dissections are made to arrive at a generalised conclusion.
The five-member middle-class Lambert family
divided into the first generation consisting of Enid and Alfred and the second
generation of Gary, Chip and Denise, is the author’s choice. However, within
this family of five could be found all the trappings of a modern society – from
drugs to divorce, profit to parenting, sex to sexuality, convention and conformation
to misfits and maladjustment. Each of the Lambert children is hiding something;
each is facing a unique set of problems; each has his or her own views on what
life should be and all have corrections to make. Gary, the eldest, is facing
the challenge of bringing up his own children in a world that is vastly
different from what it was when was growing; his children’s world is a world where
games and self-helps books abounds, where the disease of self-aggrandisement
through acquisition of goods starts young. In addition to his demanding
children is a well-off wife who sees all problems as psychological and relies
on self-help parenting books, games and television to raise her children and
who believes that the only definition of love (especially towards her children)
is to provide all their fantasies. She also is very fixed when it comes to what
or who a family is – husband and children. Gary is also profit oriented and
sees himself as the only successful person among all his sibs. He is a keen
investor and will make profit of everything even if it includes committing his
father to a nursing home so he could sell the house because of the rapid
increase in house prices.
Chip is the second child whose vision of success
is at variance with society’s definition. Thus, as intelligent and liberal as
he is he found it through the hard way
that life is like the Procrustean bed, if you don’t fit it, you will either
have to be stretched or butchered. Having been fired from his position as a
lecturer for bedding one of his students and using drugs – and the case was
brought against him by the girl – he found himself in an Eastern European
country working to defraud American investors.
Denise left school, young, to marry and elderly
man. There was a divorce and a series of relationship with married men and
women. Her confusion about her sexuality saw her meteoric rise to become a
socialite and her immediate freefall from that acme. And though several
openings were made available to her, she was reluctant to change directions
from chosen path of self-destruction.
Alfred lives with his principles and has raised
his children on them. But now he is suffering from Parkinson’s diseases and he
is losing his sanity. He won’t agree to being committed to a nursing home,
neither will he agree to use a shower even though he always gets stuck in the
tub. He’s at loggerheads with Gary who believes his father isn’t acting right and
understands less and he knows Denise’s childhood secret even though he chose
never to confront her.
Enid believes in her children and sees them
with a different set of eyes. In fact, she has chosen to believe that Chip
works on Wall Street even though that correction has been made several times.
She compares her life with her friends and feels she’s been short-changed. And Enid
is willing to bring all her children together for one last Christmas, a
Christmas that will unite a family that is on the verge of total collapse. She
also has a secret, with drugs.
As a dispassionate analysis of the middle class
family and consequently of society, Franzen avoided pandering to either side,
remaining neutral and non-judgemental in the entire discourse; hence, do not
expect to have any semblance attachment to any of the characters. The work
would have greatly suffered if that were possible. However, for what the work
lacked in empathy, Franzen made it up with his powerful prose that carries the
story and makes the reader turn the pages. And this is where the success of
Franzen’s work lies.
It must be said that even though the issues
raised in this novel are peculiarly American in its fullness, it is creeping on
those of us on this side of the Atlantic; however, ours have not evolved to
this extent thus making comparison difficult. For instance, though the family
unit has moved away from the extended family system model to the nuclear family
system, similar to the Lamberts, the parent-child bond is yet to suffer the
Lambert-stress. Again, regardless of the wealth status of the parents, children
still serve as some form of life insurance for parents in their old age. In fact,
it is respectable to be seen to be caring for your parents, at least currently
and at least in Ghana, I’m yet to read of people who have committed their
parents to nursing homes.
All in all The
Corrections, which could easily have been titled One Last Christmas, is better than I imagined it to be. I enjoyed
it immensely.
I like your analysis of the book. I haven't read it but you've given me a good idea of what to expect, and I appreciate your enthusiasm for it as well!
ReplyDeleteThanks Marie. I loved it.
Delete